Renuka’s violence against men in uniform

Court orders framing of charges against Renuka

NEW DELHI: A city court has ordered framing of charges against tourism minister Renuka Choudhary in a 12-year-old case.

Choudhary was accused of beating up a traffic cop who stopped her from taking a road which was closed due to security reasons for the PM’s motorcade. The court has fixed March 15 for framing of charges.

“A prima facie case under Sections 332 (voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty) and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) of IPC is made out against Renuka Choudhary,” it said.
Renuka Choudhary fails to get relief in assault case

New Delhi: Union Tourism Minister Renuka Choudhary, facing charges of assaulting a police constable in New Delhi 11 years ago, has failed to get any relief from a Delhi court which refused to recall the summon issued to her.

Citing a recent Supreme Court judgement, Metropolitan Magistrate (MM) Siddharth Sharma said that Magistrates do not have the power to recall their summoning order.

The court has now fixed February 9 for hearing arguments on the charges to be framed.

Delhi Police had registered a case against Choudhary, then a Rajya Sabha member of the Telugu Desam Party (TDP), on January 20, 1993, for allegedly assaulting a Head Constable who was on duty along the then Prime Minister’s route.

The FIR registered at Chanakyapuri police station said that traffic was being diverted at the Teen Murti Marg-Kautilya Marg-Shanti Path intersection that day as the Prime Minister’s convoy was scheduled to pass along.

At that time Choudhary came there driving a Contessa car. She refused to heed the police advice. Instead she got out of the car and “kicked and slapped” Head Constable Janaki Ram, who had asked her to stop the vehicle, the FIR alleged. Later on, learning that she was an MP, police had allowed her to go.

In May 1993, police filed a chargesheet against her, but a Metropolitan Magistrate declined to accept it unless Choudhary was arrested.

Police moved the Sessions Court against the MM’s order and on July 13, 2000, the same was set aside and the case sent back to MM’s court, which took cognizance of the chargesheet and summoned her.

NDTV Article on the same
Assault case: Renuka Chowdhary discharged

Friday, April 1, 2005 (New Delhi):

A Delhi court today discharged Union Tourism Minister Renuka Chowdhury in an assault case.

The verdict came twelve years after Chowdhury allegedly beat up a police personnel for stopping her on a route through which the Prime Minister was to pass.

In a major relief to Chowdhury, Additional Sessions Judge D S Paweriya allowed the revision petition filed by her.

Period of limitation

He set aside Metropolitan Magistrate Siddharth Sharma’s February 9 order to frame charges against the Union Minister saying the Magistrate “has committed illegality by taking cognizance of the case without condoning the delay….

“Accordingly, his order directing framing of charges against Chowdhury is set aside with the observation that chargesheet was filed after period of limitation, cognizance of which could not have been taken in the absence of delay explained by prosecution or condonation of delay by a concerned court”.

Prima facie case

The Magistrate had earlier said that a prima facie case under Sections 332 (voluntarily causing hurt to deter public servant from his duty) and 353 (assault or criminal force to deter public servant from discharge of his duty) of IPC was made out against the Union Minister.

On January 20, 1993, Assistant Sub Inspector Suraj Mal, posted on the route at Kautilya Marg near Teen Murti on which the Prime Minister was to pass, had detained Chowdhury’s car.

Chowdhury then got down from the car, quarreled with Head Constable Janki Ram, also on duty, and abused him besides giving him fist blows and kicks, thereby, obstructing him from performing his duty, they alleged. (PTI)



  1. February 9, 2009 at 11:05 pm

    Why the f*** should the road be closed for the PM in the first place?

  2. tyler said,

    April 29, 2009 at 3:38 pm

    security reasons, i dont believe that you are that dumb to ask this retarded question.

    • Arnold said,

      April 30, 2009 at 12:42 pm

      No, I understand “security reasons”. I don’t understand justification in closing a road because of that. Like seriously, to me the Prime Minister has no more right have a road closed down for him than I do. He is no greater a citizen of the country than I am. And the road being public property, it should not be closed for the “security” of one person.

      • Jack Fowler said,

        January 29, 2011 at 12:14 pm

        The Prime Minister’s life is of higher value than yours or of hundreds of other common people.
        Like it or not, this is a FACT.

        So yes, it makes perfect sense to close down a road for the Prime Minister. If you don’t like it… then that’s too bad.

  3. என் வழி தனி வழி ... said,

    July 26, 2009 at 5:21 am

    they are all kings of India …

  4. Сука ебет said,

    August 3, 2009 at 3:19 pm

    Are you guys serious????
    This b&*(h hit a policeman and you guys are worried about roads being closed!!!!

  5. Fighter said,

    April 9, 2011 at 7:20 pm

    Today in our country all the women laws are being misuse, now a days large number of girls and their family misuse the 498a, DV, Maintenance and child custody laws. they feel that boys family a money making machine or a ATM card and they keep trying to earn large amount from the boys family. lakhs of innocent families in our country are not aware about this kind of laws. this is the activity of our feminist laws maker and national women commission in our country who are collecting and earning huge money from foreign countries and in the name of women protection law and child protection. in this our country lawyer, judges and other politician also involve. they want to make their political career and vote bank but in other way they are ruin the society and our families. few families are keep misuse the laws and making money from number of time marriages and immediate after filing the false cases. now govt bring another law irretrievable breakdown of marriage in divorce. this will be again going to misuse by our society criminals. this law bring in Hindu marriage act because few politician and high society people need divorce for their family member immediate. From the day one when the law made 498a, DV, maintenance, divorce and child custody laws only misuse and harass the citizen. change this laws fight and start protesting against this laws and make the NCW activity stop soon for our next generation. They are not doing any kind of improvement to women of the society, just breaking our families.

    1. Stop the activity of national women commission (Biggest criminal organization of our country), close them soon.
    2. Changes in laws 498a, DV, maintenance, divorce and child custody so that no one can misuse and not use this for breaking the innocent families.
    3. Kids should not suffer.
    4. Provision for given compliant about the judges, lawyer and police who are help the people to file false cases and misuse them.
    5. If any citizen give a complaint against them immediate action should be taken.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: